Archive for category Olympicene
Nature recently posted about a Journal that Publishes 200 Word Articles. The reporter commented “it is the latest online journal promises to bring a little brevity to science by accepting submissions of 200 words or less”. Initially I thought it was a Nature experiment but it isn’t. The intention around this new Journal of Brief Ideas is outlined here : http://beta.briefideas.org/about.
Some of the comments on the Nature post are interesting. This one from Bob Buntrock, who I know well from the Chemical Information list server probably represents a large number of people:
“200 words is not even a good abstract in most cases. Sop to the Twitter crowd. Since I do not nor plan to use social media for scientific communication, I’ll never use it and I’ll tend not to respect it.”
Personally, I BELIEVE in micropublishing. That’s why when I joined RSC over 5 years ago and we unveiled ChemSpider at our first conference in Glasgow the NEW idea that Valery Tkachenko and I pitched was to take advantage of our knowledge of cheminformatics, chemical data handling in ChemSpider and the increasing activities in blogging and microblogging and apply them to something called “ChemSpider Syntheses”. The ChemSpider Journal of Chemistry had been run as an experiment already, and is still online. We had already shown that Open Access articles such as those from MDPI Molecules could be hosted in the ChemMantis platform and marked up with interactive chemical widgets. We were already aware of the great work done by the SyntheticPages group and we chose to collaborate to create ChemSpider SyntheticPages (CSSP) as announced here.
Since then CSSP has accepted many articles and became the host of all of the Olympicene synthetic steps. The story of Olympicene is in this YouTube video and the list of synthetic steps is here. Peter Scott has told his story about CSSP and submissions have continued.
I took a look at some of these articles and if I exclude the Title, data such as NMR list of shifts and Chemicals Used then MANY ChemSpider SyntheticPages articles are about 200-250 words (i.e. the Procedure and the Authors Comments). All articles submitted to CSSP go through a fairly light review process from one of the editorial team, generally in about 24 hours, then are published and the community can comment on them – open peer review.
I also believe in the possibilities associated with Nanopublishing and nanopublications and there is work afoot to unveil some of these from text-mining efforts.
While our micropublishing efforts are focused on chemistry and syntheses specifically I believe there are other opportunities. Certainly Figshare, Slideshare and Dryad can all host micropublications already. The efforts of the Journal of Brief Ideas is a new approach and an experiment worth watching! Good luck to them!
Dealing with the Complex Challenge of Managing Diverse Chemistry Data Online to Enable Chemistry Across the World #ACSsanfran
This is my third presentation today at the ACS meeting in San Francisco on 11th August 2014
Dealing with the Complex Challenge of Managing Diverse Chemistry Data Online to Enable Chemistry Across the World
The Royal Society of Chemistry has provided access to data associated with millions of chemical compounds via our ChemSpider database for over 5 years. During this period the richness and complexity of the data has continued to expand dramatically and the original vision for providing an integrated hub for structure-centric data has been delivered across the world to hundreds of thousands of users. With an intention of expanding the reach to cover more diverse aspects of chemistry-related data including compounds, reactions and analytical data, to name just a few data-types, we are in the process of implementing a new architecture to build a Chemistry Data Repository. The data repository will manage the challenges of associated metadata, the various levels of required security (private, shared and public) and exposing the data as appropriate using semantic web technologies. Ultimately this platform will become the host for all chemicals, reactions and analytical data contained within RSC publications and specifically supplementary information. This presentation will report on how our efforts to manage chemistry related data has impacted chemists and projects across the world and will review specifically our contributions to projects involving natural products for collaborators in Brazil and China, for the Open Source Drug Discovery project in India, and our collaborations with scientists in Russia.
The story about Olympicene was released earlier this week to great fanfare online. I discussed the details here. There has been so much press with comments made online on the websites of Popular Science, Scientific American, BBC News, the Huffington Post and many others that I wondered whether it would be appropriate to suggest an article get written for Wikipedia.
Now, I am VERY concerned with notability on Wikipedia, as evidenced by my post here about notability. I think Olympicene is “notable”. I am also concerned with being flagged with conflict of interest as I was involved with the Olympicene project. My intention was to ask the community to participate in writing the article. However, after checking Wikipedia I was happy to find that the community already got to it. In two days 9 authors had already worked on the article! I checked the View History logs…I don’t know who ANY of them are….so I am not in conflict of interest there either by asking someone to write it!
The Wikipedia article on Olympicene is here. It would be ideal to get the color image up there for dramatic effect as well as the original concept details when Olympicene was introduced, as well as at least some representatives of the synthetic path on ChemSpider SyntheticPages. I can’t add them…I’ll get flagged probably. I’d also link to the ScientistsDB article about Graham Richards as it is much richer than the one on Wikipedia.
Either way…from release to Wikipedia same day and nine authors in two days. Now that’s community collaboration!
The story of Olympicene, and our intention to try and get it synthesized and analyzed, was first reported in August 2011 here. The original conversation was between Prof Graham Richards and I over a drink in Belgium at the RSC Editors Symposium in March 2010. The concept of having someone synthesize a small organic molecule that would be a molecular representation of a famous symbol of sport was a fascinating challenge. And, always one for a challenge, it was one that was pursued with great gusto!
Since we had started the ChemSpider SyntheticPages (CSSP) platform recently I thought it was appropriate to kick off a grand vision discussion with Peter Scott, one of the editors of CSSP. My original idea that I bounced off of Peter was a big one…an international competition exposed to the chemistry community. Encourage chemistry labs around the world to submit their step-by-step syntheses to CSSP. We would be able to collect and expose all of this work to the entire chemistry community. We would set up a voting scheme for the community to give their input on what was the most elegant synthesis, the greenest, what had the best analytical data, what had the best write up. Not all categories were detailed at that time and would come later but the concept of bronze, silver and gold medal winners in an international chemistry competition made sense. We were really excited by the possibilities but for many reasons (read that as many distractions) we rolled the announcement out as a smaller announcement and encouraged participation as best as we could with a small engagement profile via this blog. It did seem to garner a lot of attention but as is common with such projects the participation was not as high as we expected. Nevertheless one lab did step up to participate in the project, the lab of David Fox Group at the University of Warwick. David is a colleague of Peter Scott’s…small world…
David had one of his students pursue the synthesis, not only because the olympicene molecule might be an elegant piece of synthetic work, but also because some of the envisaged properties could well be of value (more on that later!). Anish started publishing his syntheses to CSSP in November of last year as listed here. You can see the Olympicene compound coming together step by step and yes, the final step is not yet reported! Once the compound was made then the possibilities of having it analyzed seemed rather interesting, especially having seen the work reported by IBM in 2009 regarding the single molecule imaging of pentacene. Also, I had followed the work of Marcel Jaspars, who I had known during my time working at ACD/Labs when I was working on Computer-Assisted Structure Elucidation [1,2]. Marcel had recently worked on an NMR and microscopy imaging project to confirm a chemical compound structure. Again, small world. I asked Marcel for an intro to the researchers at IBM and we started a dialogue. Researchers at University of Warwick had already applied Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy (Dr Giovanni Costantini and Ben Moreton at Warwick) and they then connected with Leo Gross with the idea of using the noncontact atomic force microscopy approach.
Within a fairly short period of time IBM had performed the very elegant work of imaging olympicene…just one of the images is shown below but there are others shown on the Flickr account.
A single olympicene molecule is just 1.2 nanometres in width, about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair. This is beautiful! For whatever reason it looks like a molecule with a smile at the success of the work too!
The story of the work is described in this video below.
The work is not over yet! There is a research paper to come from the University of Warwick and IBM Research labs as there is definitely unique science that has come out of this work and definitely needs to be reported. That molecule, as it were, is “NOT just a pretty face”. We will submit all the appropriate images and available analytical data onto ChemSpider and CSSP as time allows.
For now I simply smile at the story of a concept discussion between Graham and I that was taken into the hands of superb scientists and brought to fruition. Congratulations to ALL of those who worked on the project in David Fox’s and Leo Gross’s labs. Thanks to the marketing people at IBM, RSC and Warwick for bringing together all of the materials in a tight time frame to tell the story. My thanks to my colleagues at RSC who believed in the potential of this project and especially to Peter Scott for seeing the potential and willingly participating! This project is a great example of international collaboration and pushing science to its extremes. It was a pleasure to be involved if only at a concept level and HOPEFULLY I will get to meet the scientists who did the work sometime!